Ratings

Engaged in the study sereznym ratings on websites and made some conclusions. I had to agree with Cyril Bystryakova that -1 karma - evil. From him all the problems.
Normal people usually vote -1 if the article should simply withdraw from the resource. And normally, or do not vote or give a. -1 - It is the grace for the trolls that minus all (well, I do not understand any of the reasons) or for pimply teenagers who throw out their hormones in protest. Habr suffers. Research, conducted a small number of resources on the. A lot of people put -1 for a post that is simply beyond their competence. Well, just for the fact that he is not interested in them. It does not reflect the quality of content already does well,. And people who understand the topic (I goovryu of adults ), or pass or put a.
Total, my advice - all ratings can only improve. And a separate button 'post a foul - soobshit editor '.
This principle must be an order to improve the quality and content authors to write back.
The more visitors, the greater the absolute number of insane people, and the higher rising to become inadequate and below the average level of assessment to become a post.

I'll bet.